data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7143/c7143662adf0a5b19acd95e8f65c4601bb83e0e6" alt=""
As I mentioned yesterday, last weekend, I read two books on the craft of writing by literary agent Donald Maass:
Writing The Breakout Novel and
The Fire In Fiction. Both were excellent reads, but I'm going to focus these discussions on
The Fire In Fiction.
In this book, Mr. Maass points out that there are no truly original ideas.
"Every novel has antecedents. Every author has influences. It is impossible to be wholly original; even so, some novels feel fresh and shake us with their insight."
So, if this is true, what makes the difference? Look carefully at that quote. Mr. Maass states that 'Every author has influences.' That, my friends, is where the fire comes from. It doesn't come from the plot, the characters, the setting, or the voice. It comes from the author's passions, which have developed over time because of life experiences.
How do we find that passion within ourselves and transfer it to our writing? This is exactly what Mr. Maass answers in
The Fire In Fiction.
He talks about two types of writers: the status seekers and the storytellers. The status seekers start out with all kinds of passion, the main goal being publication. They settle for good enough. This kind of passion fizzles out over time. The storyteller, on the other hand, has one goal at heart: making his novel the best it can be, and each successive one even better than the last. This passion never goes away.
I think, it's possible to be a little of both. Don't most of us writers dream of the day we will be published? Of course we do. But this can't be our only motivation. We have to strive to become better, stronger writers, and we have to be passionate about the art of writing, not just about the dream of publication.
I'm guilty of being a status seeker at times, but I want nothing more than to be a storyteller. What about you? What kind of writer do you want to be?